With only a year left on the timeframe set for the conclusion of the Millennium Development Goals(MDGs), the international community is actively in the process of developing a new framework which will set the tone for the international development scene after 2015. Centering on the values of human rights, equity, and sustainability, the Post-2015 Development Framework is expected to show a mid- to long-term vision in tackling global challenges and environmental changes in line with the establishment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
One of the most significant features of the current discussion on the Post-2015 development agenda is its particular focus on the means of implementation for the new goals in the Post-2015 era. As a means of implementation, financing for development is deemed central to achieving the goals. Considering the current circumstances where the international environment is changing rapidly while new challenges arise, additional financing is absolutely necessary in the pursuit of renewed development goals. As a consequence, Korea must expedite progress in expanding the development agenda as well as increasing finance for development.
In this regard, this policy paper aims to review the discussion on increasing financial resources for development and seeks to draw implications for Korea in order to respond appropriately to the issue. For these purposes, this report first provides an overview of the chronology of discussions on SDGs and analyzes international observations on the scale of finance necessary for achieving the SDGs. Then we further explore some technical details on financing for development, including the modernisation of the ODA definition and new measure of total official support for sustainable development. The paper moves on to seek various ways of utilizing public support to stimulate private sector resource mobilization. By conducting case studies on development finance mechanism of the German KfW Development Bank and France Development Agency (AFD), the report provides insights on additional types of financing, such as blended financing, guarantees, capital subscription, and mezzanine finance.
In conclusion, the paper suggests some policy measures to efficiently raise resources to finance the Post-2015 development framework; First, greater emphasis should be placed on expanding and utilizing other official flows(OOF) as well as ODA instruments from the view point of private resource mobilization. This effort should not become a way to avoid the pledges to increase ODA volumes, but rather an additional form of effort to effectively incentivize and leverage private sector investment for financing sustainable development goals. Also, domestic financial institutions for development such as the Economic Development Cooperation Fund (EDCF) need to propose and share various financial instruments and wide-ranging expertise to strengthen public-private partnership for international development cooperation programs. Lastly, the paper suggests measures to connect climate finance with financing for development, which is imperative to the post-2015 framework.

서언 

국문요약 

제1장 서론 
1. 연구 필요성 및 목적 
2. 연구 방법 및 구성 

제2장 Post-2015 개발 프레임워크와 재원 수요
1. Post-2015 의제 설정 
2. Post-2015 비전: 지속가능발전 
가. 지속가능발전의 개념 정의 
나. 지속가능발전목표의 주요 내용 
3. 지속가능발전 달성을 위한 재원 규모 
가. 재원수요 추정방식 
나. 재원규모 예상범위 

제3장 개발재원 논의 동향 및 쟁점  
1. 국제사회의 개발재원 논의 경과 
2. 개발재원의 유형별 추이 
3. 개발재원 측정방식의 쟁점과 이슈 
가. ODA 정의와 개념의 현대화 
나. 양허적 성격의 정량화 
다. 증여등가액 도입 
라. 새로운 공적 개발재원 측정 수단: TOSD 
마. 수원국 관점  

제4장 개발재원 확대를 위한 민간재원 동원방안 
1. 민간재원 동원을 위한 공공재원의 역할 
2. 국제사회의 민간재원 동원 사례 
가. 개발금융기관의 민간재원 동원 방식 
나. 독일 
다. 프랑스 
3. 기후변화 대응과 민간재원 
가. 기후재원 조성 논의  
나. 기후재원과 개발재원의 관계  
다. 민간재원 동원과 측정 

제5장 우리나라 개발재원 현황 평가와 개선방안 
1. 개발재원 조성 현황 및 평가  
가. 개발재원의 구성 
나. 유형별 현황 및 평가 
다. 수원국별 특성 및 시사점  
2. 정책과제와 개선방안 
가. ODA 지원효과의 제고 
나. 민관협력방식을 활용한 개발재원 마련 
다. 기후재원과 개발재원의 연계  

제6장 요약 및 결론 

참고문헌 

부록 

Executive Summary