본문으로 바로가기

전체보고서

발간물

목록으로
Working paper 외환위기 이후 한국해외현지법인의 구조조정실태와 애로사항 : 태국 기업경영

저자 권경덕 발간번호 98-11 자료언어 Korean 발간일 1998.12.30

원문보기(다운로드:651) 저자별 보고서 주제별 보고서

그동안 태국은 안정된 환율을 바탕으로 외국인투자를 유치하여 산업발전을 이룩하였다. 태국에 대한 외국인투자는 일본, 미국, 유럽 등 선진국과 대만, 홍콩 및 한국 등의 투자가 활발하였는데 주로 제조업을 대상으로 활발한 투자가 이루어졌다. 이들국가들은 자국의 임금인상과 수출전진기지 확보 및 원자재 조달 등의 이유로 對태국 투자활동을 활발히 전개하였다. 1997년 한국과 태국은 외환위기로 인해 IMF로부터 긴급자금을 지원받았으며, 이후 강도높은 경제개혁을 추진하고 있다. 이후 양국은 극심한 경기침체 현상에 직면하였으며 현지에서 활동하는 외국기업들의 투자활동에 많은 영향을 주었다. 그러나 태국의 외환위기이후 현지 투자기업들은 자금조달과 내수침체로 인해 경영난에 처하여 대부분의 진출기업들은 투자축소 내지 보류를 검토중에 있다. 또한 한국에 닥친 외환위기는 우리기업의 해외직접투자가 자금사정 악화와 경영여건 악화로 큰 폭으로 감소하고 있는 실정이며, 현지기업들에게는 국가신용도 하락으로 인해 금융기관으로부터 자금조달이 어려워지는 등 二重苦속에 있다. 우리나라와 태국의 외환위기 상황을 고려할 때 우리기업들의 앞으로 충분한 현지화학습을 수행하고 위기에 대처할 수 있는 방안을 마련하는 등 對태국 투자 및 경영전략을 점검할 필요가 있다.

그러나 태국은 경제회복의 모범국가이며 회복가능성이 어느 위기당사국보다 높고 시기가 빠를 것이 예상되므로 변화된 상황에서의 투자활동 전략이 필요하다. 일본의 경우, 실제 투자기업을 지원할 수 있는 프로그램 및 기관이 있어 투자기업은 투자활동에만 전념할 수 있다는 점을 배울 필요가 있다. 현재 한국이 경제적으로 어려운 시점이나 해외에서 활동하는 현지법인들에게는 일본과 같은 지원이 절실하며, 이를 통한 경쟁력확보가 요구되고 있다.
Stubborn defense of currencies depleting foreign currency reserves led to financial crises in Korean and Thailand. This resulted in both countries agreeing to implement restructuring and liberalization measures in exchange for much needed assistance from the International Monetary Fund and other international financial institutions. Since the outbreak of the financial crisis in 1997, both countries have continued to work closely with the IMF and have made great strides toward recovery.

Demonstrating the success of Thailand's response, many foreign investors have made significant recommitment or continued commitment to the country. Investment from the EU, the US and Japan have all increased lately. In addition to the improving prospects of the domestic economy, investors are drawn to the lower labor and raw material costs offered since the fall in the value of the baht.

The Bank of Thailand announced that foreign direct investment (FDI) totalled USD 7.6 billion in 1998, the highest level in the country's history. A total of USD 2.1 billion was invested in the banking sector, with the remainder going to the real sector. Of the USD 5.5 billion investment in the corporate sector, USD 4.5 billion went towards equity investment. Japan was the largest investor in 1998, accounting for one-third of total inflows into Thailand, followed by the United States with a 17% share and Hong Kong with a 9% share.

The industrial sector received 47% of non-bank FDI in Thailand, followed by 18% in trading and holding companies and 13% in financial institutions, mostly in retail banking. Investment in the machinery and transportation sectors accounted for 31% of total industrial investment in 1998, followed by 17% going to the oil refinery sector, 16% in the ferrous and non-ferrous metals sector and 9% in the petrochemical sector.

The majority of foreign investment to Thailand in 1998 was used to boost the the financial structure and efficiency of local firms. Almost none went towards increasing production capacity. This trend will likely continue until recovery has been realized and positive growth has continued for a number of years. Meanwhile, worries of a widespread takeover of key Thai industries by foreign investors have proved largely unfounded. In a survey of 50 leading industrial firms in Thailand, only 14% of foreign investment in 1998 was characterized as investment intended to rest corporate management away from domestic control.

To further take advantage of the benefits of foreign investment, in June 1998, the Thai Government announced a series of measures designed to help revive the economy by attracting increased foreign investment. Such measures would also indirectly improve efficiency and the competitiveness of Thai industries, and decrease unemployment through the creation of new jobs.

These measures included the relaxation of restrictions on the location of export promotion zones. Such zones, in which foreign companies targeting exports out of Thailand may set up operations and receive various incentives, may now be established anywhere in the country, with the local governments given largely free reign as to what incentives they want to provide. Foreign companies will be able to import most raw materials and other intermediary goods intended for exports, and also machinery using higher technology, duty-free. Meanwhile, guidelines governing the evaluation of expansion projects by foreign companies have been clarified. Such investment must surpass the former company's one-year sales by 80% and increase employment by either 500 employees or by 50% of the prior level. For projects meeting these criteria, an income tax waiver for 3 years will be provided if the project is located in the Bangkok area and up to 5 years for projects outside of the capital.

Applications for these expansion projects must be submitted to the Board of Investment (BOI) no later than December 31, 1999.Other amendments under the Alien Business Laws that will boost foreign investment and presence in the Thai export sector will also be studied and implemented. The BOI will cooperate with the public and private sectors to study which agricultural and agro-industry activities can be added to the list of activities in which foreign companies may be eligible to receive incentives. Research will be conducted to determine measures to encourage foreign companies to provide greater levels of training, engage in increased levels of research and development and to apply environmental protection measures more widely. An environment will be created to revive the real estate sector by enabling foreign companies to purchase a specified number of existing buildings, within a given time frame. The liberalization of BOI Investment Laws and Alien Business Laws will be implemented to ensure all of the above take place.Despite these increased incentives to foreign investment in Thailand, Korean direct investment in Thailand has continued to fall, while that of Japan and most advanced western nations increase. This is largely due to Korea's own credit crunch and falling credit ratings making finding needed financing impossible.

As for Korean companies already operating in Thailand, performance has varied according to the type of sales targeted. Broadly, export-oriented Korean affiliates in Thailand have outperformed those affiliates relying mostly on domestic Thai sales due to the domestic economic difficulties. However, even export-oriented affiliates have not escaped difficulties as financial support from their parent companies back in Korea has been substantially reduced, forcing them to often totally fend for themselves. Particularly, in the case of those exporters that must first obtain raw materials from Korea, troubles of the home-based companies have interrupted a smooth supply of raw materials.
Meanwhile, those companies relying on sales to the domestic Thai market have had to try to reverse strategies and increase export sales.

Overall, the coping strategy of Korean affiliates operating in Thailand is an increase in the localization ratio of production. However, Thailand shows the greatest promise of recovery among those Asian economies suffering from the financial crisis. Thus, to capitalize on the eventual revitalization of the economy Korean companies must maintain a Thai presence and implement and pursue new investment strategies vis-a-vis the country. However, such investment is unlikely to be implemented unless government support is forthcoming. Such support is exactly what Japanese government is actively providing its own country's firms operating in Southeast Asia. Similar action by the Korean government would ensure continued competitiveness by Korean firms in the region and prevent Koreans from missing out on the substantial opportunities provided by still promising potential of Thailand.
Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 외환위기 이후 태국의 경제상황
1. 경제현황 및 전망
2. 외국인 투자정책의 변화
3. 최근 외국인 투자동향의 특징

Ⅲ. 한국 현지법인의 경영실적 변화
1. 실적호전 사례
2. 경영악화 사례
3. 경영실적 변화의 요인

Ⅳ. 현지법인들의 구조조정
1. 수출선 다변화
2. 내수기반 확충
3. 한국기업의 구조조정 평가
4. 일본기업의 구조조정 전략과의 비교

Ⅴ. 결론: 한국현지 법인의 경영개선 전략

參考文獻

판매정보

분량/크기, 판매가격
분량/크기 66
판매가격 5000 원

구매하기 목록

같은 주제의 보고서

연구보고서 미·중 전략 경쟁 시대 글로벌 기업의 대응과 중국진출 한국기업에 대한 시사점 2022-12-30 ODA 정책연구 공공기관 ESG 현황과 경영전략: 해외사례를 중심으로 2022-11-21 연구자료 국내외 ESG 평가사별 점수 비교: 국내 기업을 중심으로 2022-12-30 세계지역전략연구 신남방 국가의 중소기업과 현지 한국 중소기업간 상생 협력 방안 2021-12-30 연구보고서 주요 중소ㆍ중견 기업의 대중국 전략 분석 2020-07-29 Working paper Global Financial Imbalance: Firm-level Evidence from Korea 2020-05-15 Working paper Exchange Rates and Firm Exports: The Role of Foreign Ownership and Subsidiaries 2018-08-31 연구보고서 남미공동시장(MERCOSUR)의 경제환경 변화와 한ㆍMERCOSUR 기업간 협력 활성화 방안 2017-11-30 Working paper Determinants and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Revision of the Company Act in India 2017-04-28 전략지역심층연구 한국 중소기업과 스타트업의 인도시장 진출방안 연구 2016-12-30 연구보고서 뉴노멀 시대 중소기업의 대외경쟁력 제고를 위한 정책과제 연구: 한국과 대만을 중심으로 2016-08-30 연구보고서 중국 신흥도시의 소비시장 특성과 기업의 진출전략 2014-12-30 중국종합연구 중국 인터넷기업 해외진출에 따른 한중 협력방안 연구 2013-12-30 연구자료 중국 진출 한국 기업의 유턴 유형화 및 유턴정책 개선방안 2013-06-19 연구자료 중국 상하이(上海) 시 고급소비재 시장 진출기업 경쟁전략 분석 및 시사점 2012-12-31 연구보고서 한국 해외투자의 경제적 효과 분석: 생산성, 무역, 고용을 중심으로 2010-12-30 연구자료 인도 권역별 진출환경 평가: 남부 2010-12-30 Working paper Trade Openness and Vertical Integration: Evidence from Korean Firm-Level Data 2009-12-30 단행본 대외경제정책연구원 20년사 2010-01-15 Working paper Firm Heterogeneity in the Choice of Offshoring: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms 2009-06-10
공공누리 OPEN / 공공저작물 자유이용허락 - 출처표시, 상업용금지, 변경금지 공공저작물 자유이용허락 표시기준 (공공누리, KOGL) 제4유형

대외경제정책연구원의 본 공공저작물은 "공공누리 제4유형 : 출처표시 + 상업적 금지 + 변경금지” 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다. 저작권정책 참조

콘텐츠 만족도 조사

이 페이지에서 제공하는 정보에 대하여 만족하십니까?

콘텐츠 만족도 조사

0/100