본문으로 바로가기

발간물

KIEP Opinions

인쇄
목록으로

Assessing the Reality of Killer Acquisitions in Digital Platform Market

Digital platforms have played a crucial role in fostering a platform economy. Our high dependence on digital platforms makes us think about the right level of regulation for them. The U.S. competition authorities and Congress have paid attention to killer acquisitions because of their negative impacts on competition in the U.S. digital platform market. The main interest of digital platforms is to develop the company's core technology, and the acquisition of startups is sometimes seen as a means to replace internal R&D. By acquiring promising startups, R&D projects can secure adequate funding in a shorter time, and gain the advantage of being a market leader. For this reason, GAFAM have strengthened their existing businesses by acquiring startups in high-tech industries. Antitrust regulators and governments have recently paid more attention to the ever-increasing market power of digital platforms in an effort to better understand how digital markets work and promote competition. As a result, the need to regulate many corporate activities, including 'killer acquisitions' by large digital platforms, is being raised, and the direction that regulation takes will have a significant impact on the business strategies of digital platforms and the performance of the platform economy in the future. It is generally characterized by no or low prices on the user side. Because most of GAFAM's M&A transactions do not begin to monetize only until after a large user base has been acquired, they are not challenged by the revenue criteria traditionally used by antitrust authorities in merger investigations. Therefore, in order to regulate corporate behavior, such as killer acquisitions, that restricts competition in the digital platform market, it is necessary to use innovation performance indicators such as patents. Furthermore, a change in mindset is needed in which the digital platform directly bears the burden of proving restraints of competition, rather than the antitrust authorities.
첨부파일

이전글 다음글 목록

공공누리 OPEN / 공공저작물 자유이용허락 - 출처표시, 상업용금지, 변경금지 공공저작물 자유이용허락 표시기준 (공공누리, KOGL) 제4유형

대외경제정책연구원의 본 공공저작물은 "공공누리 제4유형 : 출처표시 + 상업적 금지 + 변경금지” 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다. 저작권정책 참조

콘텐츠 만족도 조사

이 페이지에서 제공하는 정보에 대하여 만족하십니까?

콘텐츠 만족도 조사

0/100