발간물
연구자료
연구자료
Strategic Collaboration of Defense Industry between India and South Korea: Toward a Matured Economic Partnership
경제안보
저자 Choong Yong Ahn and Jagannath Panda 발간번호 25-10 자료언어 English 발간일 2026.01.29
본 연구의 목적은 한국-인도 간 방위산업의 전략적 협력을 촉매로 양국 간 경제교류를 획기적으로 심화 격상시키는 데 있다. 한국은 오랜 남북 대치 준전시 상황에서 자주국방 정책을 추구해 왔다. 그 결과 최근 한국은 국제 방산시장에서 신흥 방산 공급국으로 진입하였다. 인도는 지금 고성장 경제력에 상응하는 국방력 강화를 우선순위 국가시책으로 내걸고 세계 굴지의 무기 수입국이 되었다. 한국과 인도는 2010년 포괄적 경제동반자협정(CEPA)을 발효시켰으나, 양국의 경제 규모와 성장 잠재력에 상응하는 실질적 성과를 내는 데에는 크게 미흡하였다. 한국-인도 간 통상 규모는 한중 통상 규모의 10%에도 미치지 못하며, 한-베트남 통상 규모의 약 30% 수준에 불과하다. 최근 한국-인도 간 K9 자주포의 방산 합작생산을 계기로 두 나라는 전면적 경제협력의 계기를 마련했다.
인도는 나렌드라 모디 총리의 「제조 인디아(Make in India)」 정책 기조 아래 최근 연평균 7% 내외의 고성장에 힘입어 2030년 이전에 세계 3위의 GDP 규모를 달성할 것으로 예측된다. 이를 위해 인도는 적극적인 외국인직접투자(FDI) 유치 정책을 추진하는 한편 교역도 크게 늘려 세계적 시장으로 변모할 전망이다. 한국은 미국 트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의 고관세 정책에 대응하고, 중국에 대한 과도한 의존에서 탈피하기 위해 통상과 투자에서 다각화(Diversification) 전략을 적극 추진하고 있다. 한국은 인도를 포스트 차이나 글로벌 사우스의 대표적 시장으로 평가하고 있다. 세계 경제의 지경학적 분절화 시대 속에서 양국은 민주주의 가치를 공유하며, 안보협력 강화에 이어 통상과 투자를 확대할 경우 성숙된 경제협력 파트너로서 대외관계에서 전략적 자율성(Strategic Autonomy)을 추구하는 데 상호 도움이 될 수 있다.
본 연구에서 방위산업 협력은 국가안보와 직결되는 특성에 주목하여, 양국 정부 간(G2G) 높은 상호 신뢰를 쌓게 되며, 방산 협력의 정부 대 민간 기업(G2B), 민간 기업 간(B2B) 협력을 포함하는 다층적인 협력 체계가 필요하다는 점에 강조하고 있다. 오늘날 방위산업은 최첨단 부품과 소재를 활용하는 민ㆍ군 겸용기술(Dual-use Technology)의 성격을 지니고 있다. 따라서 국가 간 방산협력은 한나라 경제의 기술 고도화에 기여하며, 상호신뢰의 축적을 통하여 고부가가치 부품ㆍ소재의 교역 확대와 직접투자로 연계되어 전략적 경제 파트너십을 형성할 수 있다. 양국은 AI 기술혁명시대를 선도할 수 있는 인프라와 고급 인력을 보유하고 있어 본격적 방산협력의 가능성을 높이고 있다.
한국과 인도는 최근 K9 자주포의 현지 합작 생산을 계기로 방산 협력의 중요한 물꼬를 텄다. 한국은 K9 자주포, K2 전차, 천궁-II, 천궁-III 지대공 미사일, FA-21 보라매 전투기, 잠수함, 고성능 정찰기 등을 중심으로 가격 대비 성능이 우수하며 납기를 준수하는 신흥 방산 공급국으로 높은 평가를 받고 있다. 이를 토대로 한국은 세계 5위 방산 수출국이라는 전략적 국가 목표를 설정하고 있다.
인도는 지금 중국의 군사 대국화에 대응하고 파키스탄과의 국경 분쟁 등 다양한 안보 위협에 대처하기 위해 육ㆍ해ㆍ공 방위 능력을 전반적으로 강화하고 있다. 인도는 달 반대편에 우주탐사선을 착륙시킨 이후 우주기술 강국으로의 도약도 적극 추진하고 있다. 인도는 향후 통상 물류 대국으로서 광범한 인도-태평양 지역에서 해상안보 강화에도 초점을 두고 있다. 이를 위하여 앞으로 조선업 진흥과 해군력 강화도 추구하고 있다. 또한 인도는 현재 세계 굴지의 방산 구매국으로서 무기 도입 과정에서 기술이전과 합작생산을 조건으로 방산의 자국화 정책을 추진하고 있다.
한국은 세계 5대 방산수출국 목표에 이어 통상과 투자의 다변화 전략 추구와 인도의 세계 3위 경제력에 상응하는 국방력 제고라는 정책 목표에서 한국-인도 양국은 이상적 파트너로 상호인식을 하고 있다. 이에 따라 한국-인도 양국은 조선을 포함한 방산, 통상, 투자 전반에서 상호보완적 관계를 형성할 뿐만 아니라 민주주의라는 핵심 가치를 공유하고 있다.
향후 양국은 전략적 방산 협력의 심화를 위해 G2G, G2B, B2B 방산협력 모드에 합당한 정상회담 및 관련 각료급 회담을 정례화하고, 이에 따른 제도적 기반을 체계적으로 정비하여 성숙된 복합 경제 파트너십을 구축할 필요가 있다. 또한 인도와 한국은 이미 입증된 K9 자주포 협력의 성공 사례를 넘어 육ㆍ해ㆍ공ㆍ우주 전 영역에서 공동 생산과 연구개발을 촉진하기 위한 중장기 로드맵을 수립하고, 본격적인 윈윈(win-win) 협력 사업을 추진할 필요가 있다.
인도는 나렌드라 모디 총리의 「제조 인디아(Make in India)」 정책 기조 아래 최근 연평균 7% 내외의 고성장에 힘입어 2030년 이전에 세계 3위의 GDP 규모를 달성할 것으로 예측된다. 이를 위해 인도는 적극적인 외국인직접투자(FDI) 유치 정책을 추진하는 한편 교역도 크게 늘려 세계적 시장으로 변모할 전망이다. 한국은 미국 트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의 고관세 정책에 대응하고, 중국에 대한 과도한 의존에서 탈피하기 위해 통상과 투자에서 다각화(Diversification) 전략을 적극 추진하고 있다. 한국은 인도를 포스트 차이나 글로벌 사우스의 대표적 시장으로 평가하고 있다. 세계 경제의 지경학적 분절화 시대 속에서 양국은 민주주의 가치를 공유하며, 안보협력 강화에 이어 통상과 투자를 확대할 경우 성숙된 경제협력 파트너로서 대외관계에서 전략적 자율성(Strategic Autonomy)을 추구하는 데 상호 도움이 될 수 있다.
본 연구에서 방위산업 협력은 국가안보와 직결되는 특성에 주목하여, 양국 정부 간(G2G) 높은 상호 신뢰를 쌓게 되며, 방산 협력의 정부 대 민간 기업(G2B), 민간 기업 간(B2B) 협력을 포함하는 다층적인 협력 체계가 필요하다는 점에 강조하고 있다. 오늘날 방위산업은 최첨단 부품과 소재를 활용하는 민ㆍ군 겸용기술(Dual-use Technology)의 성격을 지니고 있다. 따라서 국가 간 방산협력은 한나라 경제의 기술 고도화에 기여하며, 상호신뢰의 축적을 통하여 고부가가치 부품ㆍ소재의 교역 확대와 직접투자로 연계되어 전략적 경제 파트너십을 형성할 수 있다. 양국은 AI 기술혁명시대를 선도할 수 있는 인프라와 고급 인력을 보유하고 있어 본격적 방산협력의 가능성을 높이고 있다.
한국과 인도는 최근 K9 자주포의 현지 합작 생산을 계기로 방산 협력의 중요한 물꼬를 텄다. 한국은 K9 자주포, K2 전차, 천궁-II, 천궁-III 지대공 미사일, FA-21 보라매 전투기, 잠수함, 고성능 정찰기 등을 중심으로 가격 대비 성능이 우수하며 납기를 준수하는 신흥 방산 공급국으로 높은 평가를 받고 있다. 이를 토대로 한국은 세계 5위 방산 수출국이라는 전략적 국가 목표를 설정하고 있다.
인도는 지금 중국의 군사 대국화에 대응하고 파키스탄과의 국경 분쟁 등 다양한 안보 위협에 대처하기 위해 육ㆍ해ㆍ공 방위 능력을 전반적으로 강화하고 있다. 인도는 달 반대편에 우주탐사선을 착륙시킨 이후 우주기술 강국으로의 도약도 적극 추진하고 있다. 인도는 향후 통상 물류 대국으로서 광범한 인도-태평양 지역에서 해상안보 강화에도 초점을 두고 있다. 이를 위하여 앞으로 조선업 진흥과 해군력 강화도 추구하고 있다. 또한 인도는 현재 세계 굴지의 방산 구매국으로서 무기 도입 과정에서 기술이전과 합작생산을 조건으로 방산의 자국화 정책을 추진하고 있다.
한국은 세계 5대 방산수출국 목표에 이어 통상과 투자의 다변화 전략 추구와 인도의 세계 3위 경제력에 상응하는 국방력 제고라는 정책 목표에서 한국-인도 양국은 이상적 파트너로 상호인식을 하고 있다. 이에 따라 한국-인도 양국은 조선을 포함한 방산, 통상, 투자 전반에서 상호보완적 관계를 형성할 뿐만 아니라 민주주의라는 핵심 가치를 공유하고 있다.
향후 양국은 전략적 방산 협력의 심화를 위해 G2G, G2B, B2B 방산협력 모드에 합당한 정상회담 및 관련 각료급 회담을 정례화하고, 이에 따른 제도적 기반을 체계적으로 정비하여 성숙된 복합 경제 파트너십을 구축할 필요가 있다. 또한 인도와 한국은 이미 입증된 K9 자주포 협력의 성공 사례를 넘어 육ㆍ해ㆍ공ㆍ우주 전 영역에서 공동 생산과 연구개발을 촉진하기 위한 중장기 로드맵을 수립하고, 본격적인 윈윈(win-win) 협력 사업을 추진할 필요가 있다.
This study is based on the hypothesis that defense industry cooperation between India and South Korea (ROK) goes beyond the technical dimensions of defense and technology transfer. Instead, it serves as a strategic pathway to foster deeper mutual trust, enhance economic interdependence in trade and investment, and strengthen both countries’ positions as credible middle powers in an increasingly fragmented and volatile international order.
Building upon decades of export-driven growth that underpinned the “East Asian Miracle,” South Korea—now the world’s tenth-largest economy—seeks to transition into a sustainable, high-technology economy with the goal of joining the “higher high-income” group, by exceeding a per capita income of USD 40,000. Simultaneously, it is developing a modern and diversified defense portfolio to deter persistent security challenges from North Korea and its ongoing efforts to attain international recognition as a nuclear state. Confronted with external security threats and a protectionist trade environment under US President Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda, Seoul has adopted a dual-track innovation strategy. It aims to become one of the world’s top three artificial intelligence (AI) powers and among the top four global arms exporters in the near future.
India—the world’s largest democracy by population—is poised to become the third-largest economy within a few years under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Make in India - Resilient India” policy. Departing from its historically inward-oriented economic posture, India is now positioning itself to seize global trade and investment opportunities. With per capita GDP still around USD 2,400, India seeks sustained high growth through deeper integration into the global economy. On the strategic front, New Delhi seeks to become a military power commensurate with its rising economic stature—not only to meet regional security challenges but also to strengthen its diplomatic profile as a leading middle power and a representative voice of the emerging Global South. Consistent with its long-standing multi-alignment approach, India continues to engage with a wide spectrum of partners, including the Western world, Russia, and China.
Given their ambitious national trajectories and complementary developmental strengths, India and South Korea share a strong potential for strategic convergence as like-minded partners. Both nations pursue strategic autonomy and diversification strategies in response to the intensifying US-China rivalry and broader instability across the Indo-Pacific. This shared pursuit of autonomy provides a compelling rationale for both countries to deepen and redefine the nature of their collaboration. Despite these synergies, bilateral economic connectivity remains underdeveloped. The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), launched in 2010, has yet to deliver outcomes comparable to South Korea’s trade and investment linkages with China or Vietnam. In an era of proliferating minilateralism and protectionist fragmentation, both countries must find innovative pathways to unlock their untapped potential and realize the full promise of their strategic partnership.
In this context, defense industrial collaboration offers a powerful catalyst for expanding trust, trade, and investment. The India-South Korea partnership in defense production has already yielded tangible results, exemplified by India’s acquisition of the K9 Vajra-T self-propelled howitzer, co-developed with South Korea’s Hanwha Defense—a landmark success story that opens the door for wider cooperation. The implications of such collaboration extend far beyond defense procurement: by working together in arms production and technology transfer, Seoul and New Delhi can cultivate long-term strategic trust and generate spillover effects across broader economic domains.
Defense cooperation inherently builds trust because it touches the most sensitive spheres of national sovereignty—military capability, national security, and long-term technological capacity. Unlike ordinary trade, arms collaboration requires a multilayered ecosystem involving government-to-government (G2G), business-to-government (B2G), and business-to-business (B2B) interactions. For such cooperation to be robust, both sides must align top-down strategic agreements with bottom-up industrial innovation.
Initially focused on self-defense, South Korea’s land, naval, and air systems have now evolved into competitive export products, complementing its high- tech industrial structure. Successive South Korean governments have recognized the defense sector as a vital export frontier alongside semiconductors, electronics, and shipbuilding. Given the current defense portfolios of both countries, numerous avenues exist for deeper cooperation beyond the K9 Vajra project. Potential collaborations include South Korea’s K2 main battle tank with India’s indigenous rocketry and missile programs in the land domain; joint R&D between India’s Tejas and South Korea’s KF-21/FA-50 fighters in the air domain; and cooperation in drone technology and AI-based defense systems. In the naval sphere, South Korea’s world-class shipbuilding expertise can support India’s ambitions in carrier and destroyer production, as well as joint R&D in submarine propulsion and anti-submarine systems—areas aligned with their shared interest in a blue-water navy for Indo-Pacific security.
Across land, air, and sea, India and South Korea exhibit both overlap and complementarity. India brings scale, operational experience, and a strong policy push for indigenization under Atmanirbhar Bharat; South Korea contributes advanced technology, manufacturing efficiency, and export orientation. By combining India’s demand with South Korea’s supply capacity, the two countries can move beyond transactional arms sales toward co-development and co- production ecosystems—spanning tanks, howitzers, fighters, drones, submarines, and warships.
Toward a Sustainable and Future-Ready Defense Partnership
To enhance its defense industry and strengthen its role as a major arms exporter, South Korea is undertaking a wide range of R&D programs aimed at narrowing capability gaps across multiple domains. These R&D efforts can be pursued through both indigenous initiatives and international cooperation—areas where India and South Korea can selectively collaborate on shared defense technology agendas.
Recognizing that the future of warfare will be shaped by frontier technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous systems, hypersonics, and electronic warfare, South Korea is pursuing a dual-track strategy: scaling up conventional arms exports to meet rising global demand, while simultaneously investing in frontier technologies to secure its long-term strategic edge. This dual approach aligns closely with India’s own defense industrial development under Atmanirbhar Bharat—balancing immediate operational needs with investment in next-generation technologies.
At present, India and South Korea maintain a buyer-seller dynamic. For a sustainable partnership, they must transition toward a co-developer relationship, grounded in joint R&D and long-term industrial collaboration. The India-France Rafale program and the India-Israel Barak-8 partnership exemplify how trusted, high-technology cooperation can bridge capability gaps while strengthening domestic industrial ecosystems. France demonstrates the power of deep strategic alignment and joint manufacturing; Israel showcases agile, innovation- driven co-development. Together, these partnerships form pillars of India’s evolving defense diplomacy—combining strategic autonomy with technological interdependence.
South Korea, though a newer partner in India’s defense matrix, can follow a similar trajectory. It has rapidly emerged as a global arms exporter by leveraging decades of industrialization to position itself among the world’s top suppliers. India, still the largest arms importer, is actively pursuing indigenization, innovation, and foreign investment to reduce dependency and build domestic capacity. The convergence of these trajectories provides fertile ground for collaboration. South Korea’s proven manufacturing excellence and India’s scale and demand can drive co-production, joint research, and a new wave of defense sector investment. Beyond defense, such cooperation could stimulate linkages in AI, aerospace, and advanced manufacturing.
Policy Recommendations for a Robust and Enduring Framework
1. Institutionalize Strategic Dialogues:Establish a regular summit mechanism and a biennial 2 + 2 meeting of Foreign and Defense Ministers dedicated specifically to defense- industry cooperation. These platforms should include fast-track decision-making to mitigate bureaucratic delays and manage risk effectively.
2. Adopt a Dynamic Defense Roadmap:Build upon the success of the K9 Vajra program by expanding collaboration into frontier technologies and joint export ventures. A shared roadmap should guide R&D priorities toward a future-ready defense ecosystem aligned with Indo-Pacific security objectives.
3. Prioritize Co-Development and Technology Transfer:Focus on areas of strong complementarity—artillery upgrades, naval shipbuilding, and space-based surveillance—leveraging South Korea’s high-tech engineering and India’s manpower, production scale, and market access.
4. Expand Maritime and Shipbuilding Cooperation:Launch a South Korea-India Naval Shipbuilding Partnership Initiative to jointly develop frigates, corvettes, and auxiliary vessels in Indian shipyards, including cooperation on green-ship technologies and submarine platforms.
5. Pursue Space and Satellite Collaboration:Co-develop dual-use satellites for defense communication, weather monitoring, and disaster response to enhance situational awareness and humanitarian coordination.
6. Deepen Cooperation in AI, Cyber Defense, and Quantum Computing:Encourage cross-investment and joint innovation in emerging technologies to ensure resilience and competitiveness in next-generation defense applications.
7. Align Trade and Defense Policies:Upgrade the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) to integrate defense-industry cooperation and unlock the full potential of technology and capital flows.
8. Advance Middle-Power Diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific:Leverage the defense partnership as a platform for minilateral cooperation with ASEAN, Australia, and the EU—shaping regional governance frameworks and promoting collective security.
Conclusion
Defense industry collaboration between India and South Korea is far more than an arms trade arrangement; it is a strategic necessity for two middle powers navigating an unpredictable global order. By institutionalizing cooperation, leveraging complementarities, and aligning with regional frameworks, both nations can elevate their partnership into a cornerstone of Indo-Pacific security and economic resilience.
The pathway forward is clear: deepen trust, expand co-production, integrate emerging technologies, and embed bilateralism within multilateral structures. If pursued with vision and pragmatism, India-South Korea defense cooperation can stand as a hallmark of constructive middle power leadership, symbolizing a shared commitment to innovation, stability, and strategic autonomy by 2047.
Building upon decades of export-driven growth that underpinned the “East Asian Miracle,” South Korea—now the world’s tenth-largest economy—seeks to transition into a sustainable, high-technology economy with the goal of joining the “higher high-income” group, by exceeding a per capita income of USD 40,000. Simultaneously, it is developing a modern and diversified defense portfolio to deter persistent security challenges from North Korea and its ongoing efforts to attain international recognition as a nuclear state. Confronted with external security threats and a protectionist trade environment under US President Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda, Seoul has adopted a dual-track innovation strategy. It aims to become one of the world’s top three artificial intelligence (AI) powers and among the top four global arms exporters in the near future.
India—the world’s largest democracy by population—is poised to become the third-largest economy within a few years under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Make in India - Resilient India” policy. Departing from its historically inward-oriented economic posture, India is now positioning itself to seize global trade and investment opportunities. With per capita GDP still around USD 2,400, India seeks sustained high growth through deeper integration into the global economy. On the strategic front, New Delhi seeks to become a military power commensurate with its rising economic stature—not only to meet regional security challenges but also to strengthen its diplomatic profile as a leading middle power and a representative voice of the emerging Global South. Consistent with its long-standing multi-alignment approach, India continues to engage with a wide spectrum of partners, including the Western world, Russia, and China.
Given their ambitious national trajectories and complementary developmental strengths, India and South Korea share a strong potential for strategic convergence as like-minded partners. Both nations pursue strategic autonomy and diversification strategies in response to the intensifying US-China rivalry and broader instability across the Indo-Pacific. This shared pursuit of autonomy provides a compelling rationale for both countries to deepen and redefine the nature of their collaboration. Despite these synergies, bilateral economic connectivity remains underdeveloped. The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), launched in 2010, has yet to deliver outcomes comparable to South Korea’s trade and investment linkages with China or Vietnam. In an era of proliferating minilateralism and protectionist fragmentation, both countries must find innovative pathways to unlock their untapped potential and realize the full promise of their strategic partnership.
In this context, defense industrial collaboration offers a powerful catalyst for expanding trust, trade, and investment. The India-South Korea partnership in defense production has already yielded tangible results, exemplified by India’s acquisition of the K9 Vajra-T self-propelled howitzer, co-developed with South Korea’s Hanwha Defense—a landmark success story that opens the door for wider cooperation. The implications of such collaboration extend far beyond defense procurement: by working together in arms production and technology transfer, Seoul and New Delhi can cultivate long-term strategic trust and generate spillover effects across broader economic domains.
Defense cooperation inherently builds trust because it touches the most sensitive spheres of national sovereignty—military capability, national security, and long-term technological capacity. Unlike ordinary trade, arms collaboration requires a multilayered ecosystem involving government-to-government (G2G), business-to-government (B2G), and business-to-business (B2B) interactions. For such cooperation to be robust, both sides must align top-down strategic agreements with bottom-up industrial innovation.
Initially focused on self-defense, South Korea’s land, naval, and air systems have now evolved into competitive export products, complementing its high- tech industrial structure. Successive South Korean governments have recognized the defense sector as a vital export frontier alongside semiconductors, electronics, and shipbuilding. Given the current defense portfolios of both countries, numerous avenues exist for deeper cooperation beyond the K9 Vajra project. Potential collaborations include South Korea’s K2 main battle tank with India’s indigenous rocketry and missile programs in the land domain; joint R&D between India’s Tejas and South Korea’s KF-21/FA-50 fighters in the air domain; and cooperation in drone technology and AI-based defense systems. In the naval sphere, South Korea’s world-class shipbuilding expertise can support India’s ambitions in carrier and destroyer production, as well as joint R&D in submarine propulsion and anti-submarine systems—areas aligned with their shared interest in a blue-water navy for Indo-Pacific security.
Across land, air, and sea, India and South Korea exhibit both overlap and complementarity. India brings scale, operational experience, and a strong policy push for indigenization under Atmanirbhar Bharat; South Korea contributes advanced technology, manufacturing efficiency, and export orientation. By combining India’s demand with South Korea’s supply capacity, the two countries can move beyond transactional arms sales toward co-development and co- production ecosystems—spanning tanks, howitzers, fighters, drones, submarines, and warships.
Toward a Sustainable and Future-Ready Defense Partnership
To enhance its defense industry and strengthen its role as a major arms exporter, South Korea is undertaking a wide range of R&D programs aimed at narrowing capability gaps across multiple domains. These R&D efforts can be pursued through both indigenous initiatives and international cooperation—areas where India and South Korea can selectively collaborate on shared defense technology agendas.
Recognizing that the future of warfare will be shaped by frontier technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous systems, hypersonics, and electronic warfare, South Korea is pursuing a dual-track strategy: scaling up conventional arms exports to meet rising global demand, while simultaneously investing in frontier technologies to secure its long-term strategic edge. This dual approach aligns closely with India’s own defense industrial development under Atmanirbhar Bharat—balancing immediate operational needs with investment in next-generation technologies.
At present, India and South Korea maintain a buyer-seller dynamic. For a sustainable partnership, they must transition toward a co-developer relationship, grounded in joint R&D and long-term industrial collaboration. The India-France Rafale program and the India-Israel Barak-8 partnership exemplify how trusted, high-technology cooperation can bridge capability gaps while strengthening domestic industrial ecosystems. France demonstrates the power of deep strategic alignment and joint manufacturing; Israel showcases agile, innovation- driven co-development. Together, these partnerships form pillars of India’s evolving defense diplomacy—combining strategic autonomy with technological interdependence.
South Korea, though a newer partner in India’s defense matrix, can follow a similar trajectory. It has rapidly emerged as a global arms exporter by leveraging decades of industrialization to position itself among the world’s top suppliers. India, still the largest arms importer, is actively pursuing indigenization, innovation, and foreign investment to reduce dependency and build domestic capacity. The convergence of these trajectories provides fertile ground for collaboration. South Korea’s proven manufacturing excellence and India’s scale and demand can drive co-production, joint research, and a new wave of defense sector investment. Beyond defense, such cooperation could stimulate linkages in AI, aerospace, and advanced manufacturing.
Policy Recommendations for a Robust and Enduring Framework
1. Institutionalize Strategic Dialogues:Establish a regular summit mechanism and a biennial 2 + 2 meeting of Foreign and Defense Ministers dedicated specifically to defense- industry cooperation. These platforms should include fast-track decision-making to mitigate bureaucratic delays and manage risk effectively.
2. Adopt a Dynamic Defense Roadmap:Build upon the success of the K9 Vajra program by expanding collaboration into frontier technologies and joint export ventures. A shared roadmap should guide R&D priorities toward a future-ready defense ecosystem aligned with Indo-Pacific security objectives.
3. Prioritize Co-Development and Technology Transfer:Focus on areas of strong complementarity—artillery upgrades, naval shipbuilding, and space-based surveillance—leveraging South Korea’s high-tech engineering and India’s manpower, production scale, and market access.
4. Expand Maritime and Shipbuilding Cooperation:Launch a South Korea-India Naval Shipbuilding Partnership Initiative to jointly develop frigates, corvettes, and auxiliary vessels in Indian shipyards, including cooperation on green-ship technologies and submarine platforms.
5. Pursue Space and Satellite Collaboration:Co-develop dual-use satellites for defense communication, weather monitoring, and disaster response to enhance situational awareness and humanitarian coordination.
6. Deepen Cooperation in AI, Cyber Defense, and Quantum Computing:Encourage cross-investment and joint innovation in emerging technologies to ensure resilience and competitiveness in next-generation defense applications.
7. Align Trade and Defense Policies:Upgrade the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) to integrate defense-industry cooperation and unlock the full potential of technology and capital flows.
8. Advance Middle-Power Diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific:Leverage the defense partnership as a platform for minilateral cooperation with ASEAN, Australia, and the EU—shaping regional governance frameworks and promoting collective security.
Conclusion
Defense industry collaboration between India and South Korea is far more than an arms trade arrangement; it is a strategic necessity for two middle powers navigating an unpredictable global order. By institutionalizing cooperation, leveraging complementarities, and aligning with regional frameworks, both nations can elevate their partnership into a cornerstone of Indo-Pacific security and economic resilience.
The pathway forward is clear: deepen trust, expand co-production, integrate emerging technologies, and embed bilateralism within multilateral structures. If pursued with vision and pragmatism, India-South Korea defense cooperation can stand as a hallmark of constructive middle power leadership, symbolizing a shared commitment to innovation, stability, and strategic autonomy by 2047.
Executive Summary
Contributors
List of Abbreviations
Preface
Chapter 1: Overview of the Bilateral Defense Industry Collaboration
Chapter 2: South Korea’s Rise to Global Arms Market Player
Chapter 3: India’s Defense Sector Development and Future Trajectories
Chapter 4: Strategies for Collaboration of Defense Industry Sector
Chapter 5: Way Forward and Policy Recommendations
References
Appendix
Contributors
List of Abbreviations
Preface
Chapter 1: Overview of the Bilateral Defense Industry Collaboration
Chapter 2: South Korea’s Rise to Global Arms Market Player
Chapter 3: India’s Defense Sector Development and Future Trajectories
Chapter 4: Strategies for Collaboration of Defense Industry Sector
Chapter 5: Way Forward and Policy Recommendations
References
Appendix
판매정보
| 분량/크기 | 173 |
|---|---|
| 판매가격 | 7,000 원 |
같은 주제의 보고서
연구보고서
중국 반도체 산업의 혁신과 글로벌 경쟁력
2026-02-27
연구보고서
러시아의 다극화 세계전략과 정책 시사점: 상하이협력기구(SCO)를 중심으로
2026-02-13
기본연구보고서
주요국의 신흥 제조기지 진출 현황과 시사점: 아프리카와 동남아시아를 중심으로
2025-12-30
기본연구보고서
일본의 반도체 공급망구조 변화와 한국에 대한 시사점
2025-12-30
기본연구보고서
인도 첨단전략산업 분석과 한-인도 협력방안
2025-12-30
기본연구보고서
핵심광물 공급망 안정화를 위한 통상협정 활용 연구
2025-12-30
연구자료
경제안보 관점에서 본 日·中의 글로벌 사우스 전략과 시사점
2026-02-02
연구보고서
트럼프 2기 대만정책과 동아시아 경제·산업에 대한 영향
2025-10-01
연구자료
중국과 GCC의 에너지 협력 현황 및 시사점
2025-10-01
연구자료
중국의 핵심광물 공급망 강화 전략과 시사점
2025-08-14
기본연구보고서
인공지능을 둘러싼 미중 전략 경쟁과 우리의 대응방향
2024-12-31
기본연구보고서
최근 글로벌 경기변동의 특징과 분절화 시대의 시사점
2024-12-31
기본연구보고서
일방주의적 공급망 정책에 대한 국제통상법적 과제와 정책 시사점
2024-12-31
중국종합연구
대전환기의 대중국 전략 연구2
2024-12-31
중국종합연구
대전환기의 대중국 전략 연구1
2024-12-31
연구자료
주요 선진국 과학기술 분야 규제 혁신 전략 분석 연구
2025-05-28
중장기통상전략연구
공급망 분절화의 경제적 영향 분석방법론 연구: 핵심광물에 대한 적용
2025-5-16
기본연구보고서
일본의 핵심광물자원 확보전략과 한ㆍ일 협력 시사점
2024-12-31
기본연구보고서
한-아프리카 자원 협력을 통한 핵심광물 확보 전략
2024-12-30
기본연구보고서
전략적 투자보조금 정책이 다국적기업의 투자와 공급망에 미치는 영향
2024-12-30
공공저작물 자유이용허락 표시기준 (공공누리, KOGL) 제4유형
대외경제정책연구원의 본 공공저작물은 "공공누리 제4유형 : 출처표시 + 상업적 금지 + 변경금지” 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다. 저작권정책 참조
콘텐츠 만족도 조사
이 페이지에서 제공하는 정보에 대하여 만족하십니까?
